The Institute of Art and Ideas
Clip from Sabine Hossenfelders’s academy ‘Physics and the meaning of life’ on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZDVyNGEa18
Source
Why Quantum Mechanics can’t be right @sabinehossenfelder #shorts #iai #quantummechanics
Watch the full video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZDVyNGEa18
Maybe when we figure out portable cold fusion, and anti-gravity, we’ll be a bit closer to the full story…I don’t think we’ve even scratched the surface.
Your detector is consciousness. Consciousness is everything.
When i look at something and pick it up do i need to know what a detector is? Do you know if something is in the place you left it if you dont 100% know? Its just basic common sense really.
A detector is your eye. A detector is something that effects the wave function. Yes, even your foot or the vaccuum would effect it. No detectors needed…
Calculate the vacuum.
Calc the dark e m
Calc the cmb and then our bug bang isnt working but we cant go back now. Whoops… scientists keep goijg in down this line.
What is the vacuum? Are the virtual particles jiggling in the vac because we need a detector? No. Its doing its thing because IT is the funamental contents of matter.
Explain the vaccuum because i dont need a detector for it. Quit limiting yourself.
Thank you. We dont need detectors in quantum mechanics. We had actions and causes from those actions without detectors. Noone would say a black hole or the vacuum is a detector YET it shows you quantum mechanics and properties. No detector needed, only needed if a human thinks its needed.
Who said its a final theory?
Using the macro term ‘mechanics’ for a theory that remains elusive after 100 years study is probably a non-starter..
its not quantum mechanics , but quantum quackery .. together with general relativity these fairy tales hold our science back for more than 100 years now … its pathetic already ..
😢
So are we to "assume" that quantum mechanics is not real just because it's not fully realized as a theory, so it should be disregarded completely? It's the same as saying gravity is not a thing because we don't fully understand how it works, so therefore it's grounds to dismiss it altogether.
This doesnt follow logic at all, and it definitely isn't how science operates.
Mmm.. yes. Indubitably.
The first clue is that it's based on zero direct observation, only on proxy evidence.
Most of indirect science is wrong, as proven by our very own core (Earth's core). They thought it was something, then observation contradict. Instead of accepting it not being the right answer, they add more layers to it. Now it's a double core with blablabla… always the same thing!
The complete story will also account for gravity as well as consciousness
One thing that comes to mind is, perhaps our language is the limiting factor, and isn't capable of properly describing something as complicated as quantum mechanics.
Correct.(One)
Active dynamic perception coupled with clairvoyance (clear seeing orig meaning) denies the existence of quantum mechanics, which is abbreviating and annotating infinite Timespacematter incorrectly as infinite timespace finite matter, theories are theatres of the minds while observing as being beings’ of bounded finite time, space, matter.
Quantum mechanics is a limited framework (theatre) that studies a "fragmented" view of the universe, whereas active, direct perception (clairvoyance) reveals the unbounded wholeness of existence.
By changing the mode of perception from "measuring" to "experiencing," the limitations of time, space, and matter separation vanish, revealing an "unbounded wholeness".
Shift from seeking understanding through the analysis of fragments (science) to experiencing reality through direct, unified awareness (active perception).
The "theatres of the mind" (intellectual theories) create artificial boundaries, while "active perception" allows for the direct experience of a non-dual, limitless reality that quantum theory only partially reveals
It was a circular fire squad I was smart mouth who pretty messed in help after what helped and I was never "good" at math so felt like you were my enemy, so I was smart ass but problems is SO ARE YOU lmao we just played off each other.
Sie hqben das falsche Koordinatensystem. Es liegt nicht an der Quantenmechanik. ❤❤❤
Because things go on at the sub Planck level that we will never get answers to
QM is a mathematical framework which shifts the way of thinking about physical phenomena from real numbers to imaginary numbers and from point like particles to states living in Hilbert space. It's all about a paradigm shift. It's more of a mathematical theory than a detailed decription of the real world.
That being said, QM is something between a lucky set of axioms which leads to correct prediction of physical phenomena and a black box theory, like chemistry of thermodynamics, which yields cool results despite not addressing the most basic questions.
Or maybe she approaches it from the old guard’s perspective that everything is measurable, which seem to bit be the case on quantum level.
It shocks me that a scientist is saying such BS in 2026. What you're saying is pure sophism. You couldn't be farther from the truth, this is exactly the kind of thinking that keeps science stuck, what a non creative way of observing reality. Assuming materialism must be the answer is a mistake that keeps physicists from progressing. Basically what you're saying is: let's break the radio so we can find the voice that is talking. We must consider all possibilities. Specially Plato's idealism. Have you ever considered that maybe just maybe photons have consciouness. So, first we must understand what conciousness really is… then we can move forward. Let's first get rid of our ego and consider that conciousness is not exclusive to humans.
The best detector is a human brain
She is so bad at this
"Loved this video! Sabine Hossenfelder's critiques of quantum mechanics are always thought-provoking and I appreciate how she challenges our understanding of reality. What really stood out to me was her explanation of the measurement problem – it's mind-bending stuff. Speaking of which, reading 'Eye of Shiva – Beyond the Quantum Universe' and 'The Awakening of Vishnu' has blown my mind in a similar way. The connections between quantum theory and ancient philosophies are fascinating and I love how these books explore the limits of our current understanding. Anyone else find this topic as captivating?"
I bet Sherlock Holmes could tell you what a detector does
i
Detectors, like consciousness perceive reality in a singular point in time and space. Like sensing drops in an infinite ocean. Is it possible that waves do not collapse into particles, but instead are perceived from the perspective of a conscious point in time and space that detects the instantaneous state of a wave from that singular perspective?
Sabine has lost all credibility at this point.
I think that's the beauty of human beings, they always find ways to explain reality. Even when it is not 100% true, we find wonders. I mean look at all those wonderful arts, photographs, and formulas.
I propose that Quantum integument is a resident interaction between matter and stochastic vacuum field mediated by non- euclidean plankiean lattice. This is this is just the beginning of my paper my experiment and my actual explanation and now analogous to a real world and explaining it but keep someone keeps on stealing my work and then putting it out saying it's their own and then changing it and Alterrjng it a little bit
I wonder. Will there ever be "a final story"?
If you expected a metal worker to do its job every time of finding money that's just assuming… Major clue is what I head but I think it's a small clue.
If you don’t accept quantum mechanics because it looks weird to you, after human beings making their best effort to understand nature to high level of accuracy (many digits of accuracy), then go somewhere else; to another universe that is philosophically more pleasing.-Richard Feynman
Virtual "particles" coming from parallel universes, screw up the math that these physicists use to dictate their scientific dogmas.
I wish I could come back in 1,000 years and see how much we know. I assume it will make our current knowledge of the universe seem pedestrian. We know nothing.
Who do I trust more? Feynman, or a youtube grifter?
a detector is anything to which can be transferred any part of the various excitation states of another part of or thing in the universe.
WHY CAN'T WE CALL ELECTRONS NEGATRONS?!?! I nominate this. Can I get a second?
Why are people listening to this grifter?
Nah
The reality is Quantum mechanics is not the FINAL story because of the measurement problem. The Universe obeys well definied rules which are deterministic. Probability is true but not as explained in the Many-Worlds theory. The many worlds Theory relies on the incomplete Idea of Schrodinger's Cat experiment. I Have solved this issue by making the Cat Experiment weirder by creating more states of the Cat inside the box . As result, the branching of the Many-Worlds became credible, with clear description of GRAVITY
We are the detector… always. Everything else is a tool.
Expecting a Theory to Explain it All is as silly as expecting Sabine Hossendelder to Know It All.
Humans, illogical as always.
A detector isn't a 'special object' that needs its own math. A detector is just a massive quantum system that forces decoherence. If you stop looking for a 'collapse' and just follow the math of the Universal Wave Function, the Measurement Problem disappears into the branches